I am not ashamed to admit that I love Stephenie Meyer's books.
Twilight? Loved it. The Host? Loved it even more.
Were they cheesy? Yes. Were they long-winded? Yes. Do I
care? No! They were entertaining! And guess what? They were hugely popular!
That’s why they made them into even cheesier movies okay!? (I like cheesy.)
It’s actually a HUGE pet-peeve of mine how much other
writers love to rip on Twilight. It’s so hilarious to me. I’m like, hey! If I
can write a book with that huge of a following (however fleeting) I will be
stoked! Who cares if her writing doesn’t sound like freaking Shakespeare. Oh
and the other complaint I hear all the time is how angsty and whiny Belle is….oh
give me a break! She’s a teenage girl, guess what? Teenage girls are whiny, I know this because I was one.
Ok. I feel better now. I can jump off my soap box--enough to rant about her latest book—The Chemist.
As I have already mentioned I am a fan of hers, so when I
saw this new book, which by the way I had not even heard a whisper of until I
saw it on the library shelf, I was pretty excited!
I admit—I found a lot more complaints about this book than
her others. Truth be told, I’m not sure if it is because it’s not as good or if
it’s because I read the other ones before I started all my writing training. (I’m
becoming one of them. It's so sad. I’m such a hypocrite.)
But the main point is I still really liked it. The good
things first:
It follows Meyer's same M.O.—with the whole “falling in love
with the enemy thing.” First with the Vampires, then with the evil Aliens, and
now with the more contemporary enemy—the interrogator. I feel like Myers
brainstorming sessions must go something like this. “Ok. Who is the absolutely
least likely candidate for a love interest?” She brings the whole “falling for
the bad ‘guy’” to a seriously whole new level with her books. And why is that
good? Because it’s different. It’s fun
to read about something totally unexpected.
She does a great job handling the complications of having a
character with multiple fake identities and fake names.
The beginning and the ending were huge page turners. There
were a few parts in the middle that I almost put it down, so there is that, but
the majority of the time I was very excited to sneak away and read more more more.
So now the bad things (aka, things to learn from as a
writer):
The insta-love. I know, don’t tell me. It’s been too long—but
I’m pretty sure Twilight and probably the Host were also heavily-laden with the
insta-love but were not going to complain about that today. And honestly, it
wasn’t so much the insta-love that was the problem for me, it was the fact that
Alex had no real redeeming qualities to
love. After reading the whole book I’m still not sure why Daniel fell for her
besides the fact that he “liked her face.” Actually, I take that back. Alex was
“lovable” because I liked her as a reader but I just never saw or heard Daniels
perspective on why he liked her which made his attraction unbelievable, so I
learned the importance of showing that.
The bleak middle parts. Not all of the middle part dragged
but a significate enough part that I really did consider just putting it down.
So the thing I learned about this is just tighter writing. It really is
possible to give too many details and drag on about things too much. As fun as
it is to set things up for a later Ah-Ha
moment—if readers can’t even make it through the set-up there will be no Ah-ha moment to get to!
The gun details. This might just be me, but I just really
don’t care about the type of gun she’s carrying around. All guns are the same
to me. SIG Sauer? PPK? It means nothing to me. There are probably only about
three different gun visuals I have in my head.
There’s this one
And this one
And this one.
Giving me like 15 different gun names is doing nothing for
me besides annoying me. It would make sense if she were writing for a different
audience—but I think I’m a good sample of her target audience and I’m fairly
certain that we just don’t care about the specific details of all that. It’s
one thing to mention the gun name like once or twice but I think she threw it
in there like a bajillion times. And yes, that is an accurate estimation. Just
ask my husband Jona, I never exaggerate on numbers.
Overall:
You should read it. It was fun. All silly rantings aside . . .Stephenie Meyer has a new book out after like 7 years and
that is pretty exciting!
I really liked the Host, so I'm going to give this a try!
ReplyDelete... and you're funny! :)
Ha ha! Thanks! And you should. :)
Delete